Wednesday, July 31, 2013

This Weeks Twitter Stupidity

Its actually two weeks of stupidty as I've been on other articles rather than focus on this. But here we go.

In a short section focussing on one of my favourite nutjobs who have such weird extreme views on Forest is @antreas_x.








because a club panics when it has no sponsor meaning it has no cash,or rather they are secure and waiting for a good offer (or indeed just Fawaz himself) Last year we took a quick offer because we were skint. And i also appreciate the suggestion we have no away kit is because we are skint.. Not sure how you work out that.




This was Gary Hooper based, I kept it though because apparently the Champions League isn't competative.




It'd either mean no midfield or no defence. So no thanks



Because we choose to do business slowly, rather than rushing in with huge offers, or maybe agents holding it up, the selling club, the player,we don;t know, so just blindly accuse the club.




My favourite part of the always ridiculous Hannah's tweet,is that 2 days after claiming she had no idea who Mackie was she blogged this...http://foresteverforest.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/jamie-can-help-mackie-forest-fly.html where no she is an expert on where we will use and how...



Sarx is genuinely the stupidest man on Twitter. Twatstick mentioned the 4 year plan, in relation to a QPR film,and even explained this. Sarx doesn;t understand anything

New Poll: Should Season Ticket Holders Get Forest World For Free

Purely conjecture as it won't happen I am sure, but would you like to see season ticket holders be able to get Forest World for free. Afterall they have already spent so much money, and seeing the highlights of a game already attended plus away games might be a nice bonus.
Or should it be left how it is?

Tuesday, July 30, 2013

The Radio Nottingham Situation

I have largely ignored the whole Radio Nottingham debate so far, merely guessing that something would surely get sorted at some stage, and that it was just a simple game of Football Radio Coverage Chicken.
However, we are now on the Tuesday before the game and nothing has been confirmed. Might it be Saturdays are longer spent listening to Colin Frays coverage?

Now this had led some fans to go into a mini melt down on what they are to do without their usual regime, how the drive to the game, or drive home post game will be ruined, as if Radio Nottingham wouldn’t be able to even talk about the game before hand or present some post match summarising (it would merely jeopardise live match coverage)

No, a great many have simply decided the whole match day experience is going to be ruined. And I for one would lament the loss of local radio coverage.

But it wouldn’t mean there is no options. This is the day and age of football being a business and with FFP any source of cash is going to be used. If that means making sure people get Forest Player and having an in house service, then if it pays better than the radio, then Forest are well within their rights to look at it.

This isn’t me justifying it I hasten to add, just that this is the day and age we live in.
The benefit of an in house service financially begin to become clear. Advertising. And lots of it. Not just “this commentary is brought to you by” but anything and everything could be sold. This means not only might Forest sell the rights to commentary, but also the rights to advertise before, after and during half time, maybe even during the game (and player X is booked, and if you’re ever in trouble get yourself down to Y & Y Lawyers”) Again this is me taking things to an extreme and there’s no guarantee it would happen. Just could.

I think for so long we have been so spoiled with local coverage that this very idea is so alien as to appear more scary than what it might be. There were the days remember of cutting away from the match for County and Stags updates and perhaps missing something vital.

Now maybe this is Forest playing hard ball. Pushing Radio Nottingham into a corner so far as to crumble to club demands (and the fear mongering spread about Davies relationship with local radio based on nothing more than ignoring it) and almost become a club spokesman themselves.

Additionally in these trying times the BBC looking to cut corners may have cut back budget to spend on local football coverage, they may have a maximum price they can go to that Forest are deeming too low.
It is a dangerous game. Not having free to air Forest coverage on the radio risks jeopardising a future generation of fans unable to stay tuned to games, and not become so attached. That said, if we do get the supposed deal to broadcast every game on Kuwaiti TV, then most games would be available to stream for anyone with the simply tech savvy to know how.

I think the regime misunderstand the good will carrying on a contract with radio Nottingham even for a loss would bring. You can weight up financials or maybe a falling out all you want, but a lot of fans especially on away days count on this service for providing them with the coverage to follow the club the al-Hasawi’s own. That support is needed to sell tickets, shirts, etc. Distancing a set of fans from being able to follow on weeks they can’t attend in person might be a dangerous game, and it might over estimate what lengths people will go to. Everyone has a radio, but does everyone have easy access to streaming commentary, what about those who are driving for a start?

But now we have the extreme angle where people are tweeting at Radio Nottingham, the BBC in general, Fawaz, Jim Price, Forest Official, and Robin Chipperfield demanding answers, when the reason you aren’t getting one is that right now, there is no answer.

I can foresee a situation where if not in the day or so before hand, but in the 2 weeks between the first home game and the next games a compromise being reached. It just seems a case of obstinance for the sake of it, and although I can understand why the club would seek new revenue, it risks alienating a whole branch of fans.

Monday, July 29, 2013

Remember Them? Toddy Orlygsson

Well it has been a long long time since I did one of these. One of these features where we look at the lesser remembered players of the past, and just do a little round up. Just to put in context we previously did Nikola Jerkan, Thierry Bonalair, Felix Bastians and Brett Williams.

Orlygsson


This week we look at Icelandic winger Þorvaldur "Toddy" Örlygsson. We signed him in 1989, so as an 8 year old I was fairly excited at signing a foreign player, who were still fairly rare in the English game. Especially as at the time we were banned in Europe. Toddi was apparently Icelandic player of the year when we signed him.

Olygsson was a left winger, a position being contested at the time by Tommy Gaynor, with Ian Woan to be signed by the club not long after. We had also been using Garry Parker as a left winger the season before, with Hodge and Webb being stalwarts in the middle, before Webbs departure for Manchester United. This meant we need left sided cover with Parker moving back inside, which gave Olygsson some game time.

The next 2 seasons he would barely appear at all in the first team. The emergence of Scot Gemmill, and Kingsley Black coming in, and Woan’s continual development meant the midfield would shuffle around a bit. A young Irishman named Roy keane was also fresh on the scene and Parker departed for Villa. But Olygsson would feature quite often on the bench.

In the first year of the new Premier League, Olygsson featured more often than the previous season, and the team struggled. Used mainly as cover for Woan, who missed around 20 games that year, it wasn’t to be a fun season. Although he grabbed a goal, the team were relegated and afterwards Olygsson was let go by Clark as Forest roared back into the Premier League.

Icelandic football occasionally produces players of quality, say Eidur Gudjonsen, but into the late 80’s their league would have been about as good as Wales own league. Orlygsson after Forest had a successful two years at Stoke before drifting further down the league with Oldham, maybe finding his level somewhere between the lower second and third flights.

It was always clear he wasn’t up to the task of regular top level football, but back then we almost celebrated average players, like with Brian Rice. The problem was these average players ultimately led us to relegation.

Orlygsson ended up back in Iceland, finishing his playing career where he started with northern club KA Akureyri, where he ended up as player manager. He now manages IA Akranes in the Icelandic league. I’ll always remember him as pretty much being the first foreigner in my time to play for Forest. Hardly a signal of what was to come, but a player who always sticks in my mind.

Orlygsson played 37 times for Forest scoring twice.



Transfer Rumour Mill - Jul 29th

Well it’s all gone nuts this weekend rumours wise.


Charlie Austin
Well there is a few things with this one. Firstly the odds. I’ve never really been one to gamble on where a player ends up, its, well, a gamble. But apparently his odds keep plummeting, so people think it’s a sure thing. Now the basic thing is, if you keep gambling on something bookies react by lowering the odds and lowering their risk, if more people keep betting, odds keep dropping. So although it’s also because of likelihood, it’s also in response to betting habits. Furthermore was a rumour we have a medical booked in. The fact of course we have been chasing him for the summer, and that Burnley look resigned to selling, it almost came down to a us v QPR shoot out. However remember he did fail a Hull medical. And we know about us and medicals.


Kelvin Wilson
The other rumour that won’t go away, following having the £1.5 million offer rebuffed, we have gone back in with another offer, which is being accepted as it’s what Celtic apparently quoted. It’s believed to be around £3million mark, but that’s likely to vary on a final figure. Any deal would likely see add ons if we get promoted etc. Kelvin apparently wants to move back south, as he wants to be close to his family (and apparently young daughter)


Mahmoud Hassan
Or more well known as the Egyptian “Trezeguet.” This one is apparently dead in the water according to the latest news. The 20 year old has been put on a back burner due to his club al-Ahly demanding too much. Nice and Atletico Madrid are also balking at the fee’s demanded.


Grant Leadbitter
Another deal that seems to be going nowhere. Mowbray has been quoted as saying he is integral to the side, and having £2mill offers turned down, it seems we have got the message that he isn’t for sale.


Jason Holt
Following the news from Jim price on twitter that Forest haven’t given up on any of their targets, one has to assume therefore we haven’t given up on Jason Holt. Holt a central midfielder for Hearts would be available for a fraction of the Leadbitter cost, and we seem to have tested their financial resolve with a couple of low offers. Bear in mind Hearts are in a dire financial state, so if we were still in for him, surely £300k would test their breaking point, and maybe get him. Do we need more midfielders? Well in that defensive role maybe, Billy clearly doesn’t rate Gillett, and Moussi seems to have also had his fate decided. So perhaps a new midfielder being brought in would signal the end f the respective Forest careers.

Wednesday, July 24, 2013

Is It Worth Splashing the Cash?

There are those who are saying we should fly in the face of the new FFP rules and splash the cash on players and ignore the consequences in chasing promotion. Whilst on the surface that seems a beautiful dream it has extreme perils too.


Much of what I say will be based on previous teams and previous attempts to do this, and that just chucking money at the promotion issue isn’t always the great solution it seems. However, there are as many if not more occasions where it has resulted in success.

You could argue that the recent presence of QPR and Wigan, and the ongoing presence of Fulham owe more to wholesale financial investment rather than actual quality. Remember Fulham were in the doldrums football wise before al-Fayed took them up the leagues, before selling up this season. Although now cemented the size of their ground and relative size to neighbours means they are always going to overspend. Likewise Wigan, who flew up the leagues due to heavy investment, and QPR till their relegation looked the same? So investment reaps rewards!??

No, not quite. Leeds United will always be that classic case of spending to achieve success and when that success fails, not being able to pay those bills. Now we have the rich benefactor that is Fawaz but it still means these players are club employees with wages and all that goes with it. Fawaz insists he is here for the long term, but Forest fans can be all too aware the very worst can happen. I’m not quite killing Fawaz off, but the point remains, you have to plan frugally to avoid any potential long term disaster. In a similar vein, Fawaz sources of income could easily be hit hard and in those situations you cut off your main siphons of cash. That’d be Forest.

So moving back to Leeds, loading up on expensive players doesn’t mean they achieve that success, and when they don’t that bill to foot is hard. Because often everything in future budgets is related to where you think you will be. Leeds borrowed and budgeted against Champions League finances and when it didn’t happen the bubble burst.

Nowhere more illustrated than with Portsmouth, who will be ploughing their trade at such low ebb after chasing a dream they could never really afford. That’s a potential result of doing what we’re doing. I trust the al-Hasawi's have the best interests at heart, but you have to hope their heads match their hearts for that sake.

Anything in financial terms has a bubble where prices can inflate till it explodes. Football is no exception. So yes we could go out and spend the relatively modest to Premier League fees of £10 million on players, but in the Championship, that’s a gigantic figure. Clubs who spend anything above £2.5 million overall these days have splashed it around a little bit. So much of the division is made up of clubs who roughly cope financially, breaking even is a success. Further relegations are painful financially, and thats before potential sanctions should we fall into administration.

Another aspect of just going out and trying to buy success is that it just doesn’t always work. Yes you have quality players, but without the right blend it doesn’t work. Here we look at Leicester. They have spent big sums in the last few years, but they just don’t get the blend right, and have failed to achieve what they set out for. Comparing that to someone like Palace who were finacially in danger a few years ago and changed their entire structure and they achieved success.

It’s that Palace model which I think more clubs should aspire to. But the lure and promise of top flight football and the riches it brings forces the hand of club owners to chase the impossible dream. Not only is investment needed, but sound management.

So in essence should we spend those huge sums we are linked with spending? It’s a risk maybe worth taking, but it’s one that frankly scares me as the possibilities if we fail are being left with expensive players on huge wages. Is it a risk worth taking? Perhaps

The rules on FFP are quite clear though now, but the periods of reprimand have somewhat changed. Based on the football leagues website should we be promoted this year we would be sanctioned, BUT would avoid the transfer embargo placed had we done it any later? The fine would vary from 1% for £100,000 over spend to 100% for £10,000,000 or above (then shared amongst the clubs) Baring in mind we were running at apparently around £5-7mill deficit depending on your source for the period before this spate of spending, it makes you wonder if the al-Hasawi's have decided to risk it. There is a maximum loss of £8mill allowed, £3 if the chairman doesn’t inject equity. That or we are indeed about to announce a bumper sponsorship deal. This would offset the costs. Now at higher levels this is something they are aware of and have legislated for (there is a policy of setting market values on stadium sponsorship and suchlike) but what the exact rules are I’m unsure. Bear in mind the multi millions deals done for stadium sponsorship, we could certainly look at that revenue stream to justify a large spend and get round FFP.

That would certainly explain any splurges, I have seen said by others if there is an Algerian or Arabic connection, taking Guedioura to Kuwait, and the targeting of Algerian players (or perhaps Pep just recommended them, or has been used as a lure) Either way, it seems that the club have decided to spend. As a fan this excites me, naturally I want quality, but the realist is worried what the implications could be if we don’t go up. Although firmly in support of the al-Hasawi’s we have before looked at why they own us, wondering the motives. Hopefully the spin is right, Fawaz does love Forest, but there remain question marks. Namely they turned Everton down before taking over Forest. So what’s the aim? How many care as long as we succeed on the way?

Monday, July 22, 2013

Should We Take Notice of Friendly's?

Saturday, although I didn’t go and had to “watch” via the medium of Twitter was somewhat of an eye opener. I’ll be honest I don’t see much point in going to friendly's. I’ve been to a few in the past and my view is any game that isn’t competitive, i.e. have anything to play for is boring. How can you get excited when there is absolutely nothing at stake?


But there are those who judging by this weekend seem to think that they are of the most vital importance. And then try and read a lot into games where we may have experimented, tried some new things out, using players differently, or just used it for a training exercise.

The fact that people have been reading so much into certain player’s performances is a bit odd. By this I mainly refer to Matt Derbyshire who is driving a wedge between sets of fans who recognise this may be a fresh start and those who can never see him doing well. I remain unconvinced either way. You cannot ascribe pre season form to what will happen in the regular season, it’s just completely different. You can’t replicate the pressure, or any of the circumstances.

I also have to refer to the droves of fans on Twitter who whilst were were losing 2-1 to Antwerp decided this means we should already write off the season, ship out half the players and start again. The Knee Jerker’s as I have often to referred to as must have blood pressure so high that I’m surprised their heads don’t explode if they get in such a tangle over a game that doesn’t even matter. They just veer from one extreme of emotion to another it seems.

I know footballers are usually not attributed with the highest of intelligence, but they surely have a higher level of intelligence on the game than you or I, it is after all their living. Therefore the fact some people seemed to suggest winning friendly’s builds confidence is a little churlish. Footballers know better than to attribute form from a friendly, onto potential league form, afterall if that was the case, why bother playing anyone decent t and just play non league whipping boys.

Another aspect to friendly’s is this. People see it as a chance to be able to trial tactics, but bear in mind their managers might therefore attend games to scout their future opposition. Throwing a couple of red herrings is also a potential tactic here.

And then there’s the mindless conjecture. A player misses the game; it must mean he’s off? Like what’s happening with Adlene right now, and coupled with the Post doing a none story about how Guedioura may or may not attract Premiership interest and Forest may or may not accept bids, its completely mindless journalism, commenting nothing, but making people sit up and no doubt attracting hits and selling papers. There is nothing in it. But people have put that news together with his absence this weekend and decided he must be off. It’s frankly ridiculous. Adlene was with Fawaz and Billy selling the club to potential sponsors in Kuwait apparently.

But as I say reading too much into Friendly's is a very dangerous game, trying to see what the starting 11 might be, or what the set up looks like, until that first starting XI starts against Huddersfield, we won’t know for sure. So it’s not worth getting aggro about games that don’t matter and don’t really affect anything.

Thursday, July 18, 2013

New Stupid Stuff Off Twitter This Week

I'm constantly noticing more and more ridiculous statements with the #nffc attached to it. Now in the last few days since the last episode (is this an episode?) The Mongbrush, now the Twatstick after some people told him to be less offensive has also been doing sterling work exposing idiots. But now, it's encouraging people, in the way that an ASBO is a badge of honour. Well here's this weeks examples of idiocy.



 Yeah, by the way Halford, is one year younger than Morgan. That extra year must give all the confidence....  



Not only is this nonsensical drivel it also belies understanding anything that was happening at the time. It also makes out we could easily have found a buyer for Miller (we haven't yet) and that Morgan would have stayed (he was out of contract we'd have lost him for nothing) Just think a little bit more and you might succeed.  



Then wait till the squad numbers are announced....  




You are already connected to the net, so why not step away from Twitter and I dunno, try searching. This is just something I hate on Twitter. People seeing something and asking who they are when they are literally connected to the net and the plethora of knowledge out there.  



Every player ever from Olympiakos can be based on Matt Derbyshire. Every single one ever.   





Oh Sarx. The gift that keeps giving

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

The Incessant Chase of Wes Morgan

Forest seem quite intent on purchasing Wes Morgan from Leicester City, with the various offers we have made. It was previously rumoured this week that he had put in a transfer request, but anyone monitoring the internet this week will have seen an influx of fake persona’s claiming to have club connections.


Wes in his Forest days

Morgan’s signing; primarily about playing reasons has wider reasons too. For one it’s righting what many see as a wrong. Morgan left because we were in trouble, his contract was up, and having been the longest serving stalwart and lynchpin was unhappy new players had been bought in on triple his wages. We looked doomed.

Things have changed. We look a better prospect now, more secure, not struggling in the League, and with Billy Davies back at the helm.

So maybe things are right for the return of Wes. The thing is it would also represent something of a coup. Not only is he a local rival’s club captain, but a promotion chasing ambitious local rival. That and the club legend element make this something more than a central defence signing.

Now, we signed Jack Hobbs last night, it might cool our interest. Every player has his price, true, but every club has its limit, and sometimes you just have to admit a deal isn’t worth it. We supposedly offered £2mill for Wes, and have balked at going higher. The thing is he apparently has a year left on his deal and it might be prudent of Leicester to get a decent fee whilst they can, exactly like we did when we sold him to them.

If Morgan wants to come all the better. But where would this leave Collins, and more importantly for me Lascelles. It would put them further down the pecking order, which is Collins case, fair enough, he’s been here a year, he occasionally struggled. But Lascelles has often been touted as the future. When will that be realised? If he keeps being benched or even forgotten what’s to keep him here? We might lose a great prospect because of immediate gains over weighing a long term plan. Don’t get me wrong I understand the reasons, just wonder where it leaves us.

If Wes does come back, well, welcome back, but remember that he was occasionally error prone. Megson nearly finished Wes, under him he made errors. That part of his game was never eradicated but was improved. So we really pay over the odds for a player that yes is good, but is he worth as much as that. We could put that cash elsewhere.

Even so, the pursuit of him is interesting. When the al-Hasawi's took over I said a good move would be bringing in an old legend, and they did with Jenas. That tactic seems to be continuing with Wes.

Monday, July 15, 2013

How the Sponsorship Deal Could Have Wider Ramifications

This is largely based on a bit of rumour and intrigue, and the fact that we don’t have a sponsor for the shirt yet. The gossip, and that’s gossip founded on good reliable sources on Twitter rather any #itk account which, if you have to specify and say you’re in the know, probably means you’re not, but according to these usually Kuwaiti sources there is a major stumbling block for the hopes of selling the shirts.

Fawaz would like to get a large Kuwaiti deal on side, deeming that this could be lucrative than what you’d get paid in the UK. This could have one or two ramifications, which when you look deeper and wider could have potential commercial and playing aspects to the deal.

A lot of that as I say in conjecture, a bit of guesswork, but still worthwhile maybe sketching out what might be play. I freely admit this is by no means correct. However it is also completely feasible.
Any Kuwaiti deal however would rely on securing rights to every Forest game in Kuwait, beaming live to their domestic broadcasters. Rightly, in a commercial aspect, and future commercial partner would want maximum visibility for the brand / product, and wouldn’t want to invest cash in something that would be seldom seen in their market. It’d be like Boots sponsoring a Kuwaiti team otherwise, largely pointless.
Now, That’s all well and good, but in an attempt to make this deal more palatable to big time cash, could it jeopardise things like the playing staff. I.e. would it mean Khalid al-Rashidi getting increased exposure, or more likelihood f trying for Bader al-Motawa again. Because either of those in a Forest shirt is going to have greater appeal to Kuwaiti audiences than Henri Lansbury or Simon Cox. Would there be a pressure to play commercially viable players for revenue? Again we don’t know. I couldn’t see Billy agreeing to that though, but it happens. Think of the potential shirt sales in Kuwait!!

And thus taking that idea further would it mean an effect on crowds. Let me put it like this. If the games were shown in Kuwait, that would no doubt then be streamed. If fans knew a reliable stream was always going to be there, that would surely see some more fringe fans stay away from games, or not make long Tuesday night trips to some hell hole.

The core subject wouldn’t waver, but there is a floating band of fans who you feel would just in tune into the stream every week and save on the increasingly expensive match day experience,
Ergo you have potentially hit on match day revenue. Which makes a very difficult standoff? Make no mistake, if they do have any business acumen or business savvy, this will have been considered from the get goes. So any sponsorship revenue may have to offset this cash flow too.

Now maybe this is a flights of fancy, but it all make sense in a joined up linear way. These aren’t silo ideas standing alone, but there are zero guarantees any of these dominoes would fall in order for all to happen. Just something to potentially consider when you wonder why negotiations on a sponsor are drawn out.

If of course the sponsor turns out to be something else, all of this is largely instantly thrown out.

Thursday, July 11, 2013

The Top 10 Reasons why Djebbour Deal Collapsed

We all know the official line. He refused to take a medical. And maybe, just maybe it’s the truth. But that hasn’t stopped numerous tweeters, Facebook pages and forums from wildly speculating on a “real” reason.
By the way, I don’t believe any of this, I just thought it interesting to collate.

Rafik Djebbour


1. Forest tried to offer reduced wages
Forest have form apparently for this under the previous regime, with the infamous Mark Arthur and Wayne Routledge rumour. But this is one rumour doing the rounds, one of the stronger ones being retweeted. It’s feasible I guess, but sounds convenient.

2. Djebbour didn’t want to take medical as he knew he’d fail (1)
Apparently he knew he’d fail a strenuous medical. Quite how the hell anyone knows this beyond me. Someone cited previous knee injuries. Sounds bollocks.

3. Djebbour didn’t want to take medical as he knew he’d fail (2)
Apart from this being highly libellous I’m not saying this is true, merely relaying retardedness. It’s been claimed he’d fail because in almost a Rio style, he knew any sample would come up as negative drugs wise. Pure conjecture.

4. Something vague to do with Ramadan
He’s Muslim, Fawaz is Muslim. Must be something Muslim right? And Ramadan just started!!! That’s where this guys understanding of anything ends. (This guy is always off the scale stupid on Twitter, but I’ll protect him on this one)

5. Forest Backed Out
Like the George Boyd, we got itchy feet and pulled out at last minute citing something vague like this as excuse.

6. Djebbour got a better offer so refused to finish medical knowing it would collapse deal
Probably a winner. The word is thanks to all the Twitter blather other clubs got wind so contacted his agent with an offer gazumping us and sending Raffik on his way.

7. Broadmarsh Centre put him off
Purely in jest but the Broadmarsh is a shit-hole and it could scare someone off. Well its clearly not true, but slightly funny.

8. The Eyes, The Eyes
People can't resists a 20/20jibe can they, basically the old Boyd excuse rehashed.

9. He was never going to sign and used as leverage
In an attempt to lure other clubs out of the woodwork he stalled and took time on the medical, in almost the way Blackadder tried to stall the firing squad

10. There never was a deal
In the weirdest suggestion of the day it was suggested there was never a deal, he was never there and this is all rubbish. This also isn’t Dallas, and this wasn’t all a dream.

Twitter and the Rise of the ITK

Some of you, I am aware, may not be on Twitter or forums, and may not therefore know what an ITK is. Basically it’s someone claiming to be In the Know. If someone needs to claim to ITK, chances are they aren’t. Much like most things in life, those that protest too much are often doing so for a reason.

There is a proliferation of accounts pertaining to be a journalist, or a Consultant to a Sports Management company, or even agents, such wonderfully vague descriptions. The journalists claim to work for a website which will be no more than a trumped up blog site. I could easily therefore claim myself to be a journalist, but that would be silly, I am far from it. But an out of work 21 year old with nothing better to do, well yeah he might claim it, to give himself a little self worth. A Consultant for a Sports Management company is such a wonderfully vague and hard to corroborate title that they might be. They might have been consulted once, many months ago, about something else, so it adds credence to the title. And as for football agent, well yeah, there’s a reason they never say who they are, as that info can be checked on UEFA’s approved list.

So already there we have this rise of accounts claiming to be spilling amazing cutting edge knowledge no-one else does. That’s because they chuck that much crap at a wall, some of it is bound to stick. If I speculate enough that a “striker” is signing and that mention he scored x goals in a European division, it sounds wonderfully cryptic and that I am giving you enough info to guess. Instead it’s enough rope to hang yourself, as it’s just so none specific as to be ridiculous. When something does happen they point to the fact “Well I got that right.”

If you look at any vague none specific prediction you might look right. Astrologers have made careers out of it, Nostradamus is famous for it, but if you actually looked closely at strike rates it’ll be low, until you start moulding that information to suit the means end.

So the news yesterday that we were after 3 players sent these accounts into an orgy of speculation. This then fuels the more hot headed on Twitter and forums into wildly speculating if so and so are the signing. This is the reason these guys do it. Attention. It’s a sad world we live in where by these people are so craving attention and followers that they have to lie. Last year it would be fake accounts, or parody’s. Apart from very clever ones these got tired quickly and are seldom seen (not that it’s currently stopping some) S now it’s all about appearing to have knowledge,
But we have reached a point I believe now where we have become drained and bored of these that even their time is passing. The first few were believed, the next few were taken with a pinch of salt, and the current crop are scorned and disliked. Seen for the ridiculousness of their very enterprise.
That’s the nature of the transfer window though. It breeds such a quick fire burst of activity that it launches everyone into wild speculation. The immediacy of news these days and the rise of 24 hour Sky Sports News means we are so desperate to have our appetites for this sort of thing to be filled. Coupled with at Forest the presence of Fawaz and family and advisers on Twitter it fosters a whole host of new speculation. It’s a frenzy we never saw under Doughty.

But it’s almost unhealthy. Those who are gullible are then laughed at and it creates hostility. Then there are fans that get angry we haven’t signed someone we were rumoured to be in for. But it was only a rumour. People can’t seem to see the distinction between a rumour and the truth. “Why haven’t we signed x player yet” some may ask... Well the truth might be we were never in for them, or that they couldn’t agree a deal.

I like Twitter as a medium for finding the news and interacting, but by gods it can be a frustrating place in transfer windows. I will never understand fans tweeting at a player asking if he’s going to sign (as if that would ever happen) or demanding the chairman sign his suggestion. People then get angry we might sign someone from a Champions League qualified team, and not Billy Sharp. It’s not your bloody choice pal. It’s down to Fawaz and Billy. Leave them be to get on with business. You’re not helping.

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

One Year in What Have the al-Hasawi’s Achieved?

I’m almost certain I won’t be the only one writing a piece like this today, especially with the recent explosion in the number of blog sites about Forest (when I started 3 years ago there were about 3 others, now there’s many many more). And it’s that proliferation of sites that I think indicates one thing above all with the Kuwaiti’s owning Forest. There’s plenty to talk about.

A year ago we were financially in ruin, and we’d lost a number of top players (for the purpose of this article only I will recognise Luke Chambers as a top player.) We were rudderless ship, listing helplessly. Then came in the al-Hasawi’s.

Now turbulent doesn’t quite cut the first year of their charge, and I say their, because for a while it was more a team effort with Cousin Omar running the show at first. That’s just one of the stories.
Managers have come and gone, Cotterill instantly dismissed, O’Driscoll brought in, looked ok, but dismissed. McLeish came and went in a blink and then Billy Davies came riding back into town to almost save the day.

I think the playoff push is indicative of the year as much as anything, so close, yet just lacking a little something else. We really should never been in the hunt considering where McLeish left us, but in the hunt we were, and in the end we meekly surrendered our spot to Leicester. And that’s what the whole year felt like, bravado, spirit, but just lacking a certain something.

I’m not sure which will be the longest in the memory, my anger at O’Driscoll being sacked, or the disbelief at the whole sorry George Boyd scenario. Ah yes, the anger and vitriol from people at not signing a player lots of people didn’t want. Yes the manner we did it was shoddy, but at the end of the day, what happened isn’t important. It’s only real result was McLeish agreeing to go, but to me that was on the cards anyway.

The biggest event of the season for me was the cull of many behind the scenes staff from Mark Arthur down. Fawaz had clearly decided enough was enough and dispensed of a lot of people he saw as being negative influences. There is also the rumoured suggestion of embezzlement, and certain staff being in cahoots with this.

Enough of a soap opera yet? Well how about the ongoing question of wealth (for me this doesn’t matter how much money he has as long as there is some funding) and the fact bills haven’t been paid. Journalists getting upset with Fawaz because he doesn’t play ball like the old guard did. These journalists have certainly been quiet since all the kerfuffle in January and February. Rob Dorsett all but suggested Fawaz was destroying Forest.

But has he? Far from it, the academy has been strengthened, and with links with an academy in Kuwait, which may or may not produce a star of the future, it shows intent. Fawaz has shown he listens to fans in the whole Bridgford End away fans saga which resulted in no change whatsoever. There has been increased transparency at board level, and the commercial side of the club seems to actually have been woken up and kicked into action.

I almost forgot we now have big screens, and a promise to spruce the ground up a bit, which is more than needed. Just seems before that money was only put where absolutely necessary and the supporter experience wasn’t included in that.

And then there’s signings. Ok a lot of people point out often on short deals and on loan, but they still have got bought in. New contracts handed to Majewski, Blackstock and Cohen meant key players were tied down, rather than like in the past letting them go for nothing (even if McGugan followed that tradition later)

All in all it’s been turbulent, but you know I don’t think I’d regret anything if I was Fawaz. When they took over were looked primed for a struggle. Many pundits tipped us to be in the bottom half, so to have missed narrowly out on the playoffs from where we were a year ago is wonderful. For this reason alone I thank Fawaz, another season of struggle would have been horrific. And the rollercoaster ride merely means I have a lot more to write about for the blog, and it keeps u in the papers. Gone are the rumours we’d have a squad of Middle Eastern players. That was a false rumour. The Venky comparisons have all but disappeared again now, people just seemed desperate for us to fail.

We had a short time to build a squad and we do have the old guard of staff to thank for some of those. But these players aren’t ones to lead us up. And now the challenge is to flesh this squad out to a promotion capable one. That’s Year Two’s challenge for Fawaz. I think he’s up for it.

Monday, July 8, 2013

Stupid Stuff Posted This Week on Twitter

As part of anew series I will be featuring some of the more retarded tweets you may have missed for your enjoyment. Please sit bask in the relative stupidity.




Yes, because McGugan departing for free and being replaced by someone costing a million means they have no money. Plus also McGugan was highly inconsistent. Yes in his day one of the best, but when he was poor awful. Nice try though. Think you'll be appearing every week.


This ones not so much stupid as just ill thought



and how's that team going to work then? 3 strikers? Bizarre


This is pure stupidity. On their very first tweet



bravo. Well done on getting the team your supposedly representing right. Oh wait you didn;t.


The next one make me laugh at its naivity



Yes because only the player edits his "wikopedia"  and not any old person who can because thats what Wiki is.

Good old fashioned delusion


Yes why would you choose a team in Europe, recently in the Premier League with parachute money to burn over us really?


Thats just a sample folks. I will be watching more intently now

Kenny Burns Should Shut the Hell Up

Ok, so he was a vital part of the machine that took this club to its greatest glories. That much I accept, but the ridiculous rent- a-quote that Kenny Burns, and also Garry Birtles have become just gets annoying. They of course have a view on everything, and yeah I know their business is to sell papers, or get hits on the Posts website, and therefore they adopt strong stances but sometimes I just think "Enough!"

Burns - possibly blathering

Burns has come out and said he was shocked that Miller played, and scored in the weekend’s friendly v Hibernian. Well seeing as Miller is registered with Forest, costs us a lot of money and based on his past career elsewhere isn’t all as bad as people like to think, I’m not shocked at all. In fact Miller played in a few friendlies last summer too.

What bothers me is the need of Burns and Birtles to pass judgement in this way. Maybe it’s how it was edited, but the sentiment is there, where you have an ex pro at the club passing judgement and calling someone’s presence into question. I’ve come round to the way of thinking the perhaps Miller has some kind of role to play yet. I may be wrong. But I think it would also be very foolish of Billy to let these guys go without at least taking a look.

Miller and Derbyshire were both given those chances, and both appeared to be trying to least take the opportunity to prove they aren’t has been's (or never were’s) had they not done so then yes, write them by all means. But Miller has at least put himself out there and scored, now whether that is to put him in the Forest pecking order, or whether it be to put himself in the shop window isn’t clear, but by all means use this potential weapon.


How must he think, after scoring in a game, that Kenny Burns was shocked he ever played, despite being possibly the top earner in the squad and having commanded 7 figure transfer fee’s two years ago. Miller never really got a fair crack of the whip. He was lumped alongside all other McClaren signings as wasteful and consigned to the back of our minds.

Birtles and Burns have increasingly frustrated a lot of level headed fans. Being asked their view on everything and always coming out with near gibberish. Birtles makes it worse with his work for Sky, whereby you know that he talks twaddle as well as types it before the editor.

Also Burns doesn’t always think before he speaks. I may be wrong, and I don’t know this for sure, as it’s what I heard, but was he not sacked by the club as being a post match speaker after being very critical of the regime running it at the time (Nigel Doughty) this really being biting the hand that feeds you, so he has form on stupid remarks

I know you get outspoken ex players at every club who get asked their view on every matter under the sun, but I am firmly of an opinion that if it’s something that could have a detrimental effect, then if they really do love the club, then shut your traps. What you say might well have negative results, which no doubt you’ll revel in as you get to get phoned up even more for your views on whatever is occurring. It was a bloody friendly!! Why not experiment with these guys and see how they look? There’s nothing at stake.

Thursday, July 4, 2013

Where Does de Vries Signing Leave Darlow?

I guess we should firstly welcome Dorus de Vries to Nottingham Forest. He has a rich pedigree in getting teams promoted what with his period at Swansea (let's just leave that Wolves period alone) and welcome the Dutchman to the club. De Vries joins a successful band of Dutch forest players, from Pierre van Hooijdonk, Bryan Roy and Johnny Metgod through to previous Dutch keepers Hans van Breukelen (who after leaving us had huge success at PSV and with Holland) and Hans Segers (who was involved in match fixing scandals at Wimbledon).


This adds an experienced keeper to our trio of relatively inexperienced keepers. Darlow has a half a season at best, al-Rashidi has never played in a top league and Evtimov is still completely untried. Therefore for no fee it’s not a bad signing.

Where the debate and contention comes in is what will his role will be. There was a Twitter rumour from a relatively obscure source who claimed de Vries was demanding to be the no. 1. This would relegate the very popular Darlow to the bench you’d suspect. But as I said in the rumour round up, Darlow is a young keeper, young keepers often go through a dodgy spell, and do we really want to try al-Rashidi in a potential keeping crisis? All well and good trialling in the Carling Cup, but blooding him potentially in a tough run of fixtures? Very risky.

Now if Darlow does remain number 1, we have a very capable stand in who we know can be trusted. And vice versa if de Vries is number 1, we know Darlow can be trusted, but its where this put Darlow. What will he personally feel? Hurt? Betrayed? Unloved? Maybe all three, but I’m sure Billy if this is the case will have told him he sees him as the long term heir apparent, and to learn from de Vries in the mean time.

Because for a young keeper advice and education will be key, he has had half a season in the first team, which will stand him in good stead, but maybe a short while watching and learning again might be good. There is no better education though than practice and experience, and at 22 it’s the age he should be establishing himself. That’s where my next point comes in.

Darlow has settled in the first team, he made the no. 1 jersey his own. And there was little real competition. Maybe he needs someone to push him on, to make sure he keeps improving and retains that shirt. We all saw what complacency did with Camp, and anyone in football needs to know his place is not assured so that they don’t get lazy, and stay driven. This could be a clever way from Davies of making sure Darlow remains driven, and pushes him harder.

Davies is usually quite clever with youngsters breaking through, that he keeps them believing they haven’t made it. He got the best of McGugan, it was him that ironed out most of Wes Morgan’s creases in his game (remember how mistake prone he was under Megson etc) and how he took faltering Premiership youngsters Gunter and Anderson and got them firing in our first team.

So all in all however this works out it could be good for Darlow, either as something to keep him on his toes, or a challenge to up his game further. I hope he doesn’t take the Kieron freeman approach of simply seeing a challenge for his position as insult and turning on his heels and running to a smaller club for regular football. If Darlow see’s this like that, then it won’t be good for all parties, but I’m sure Forest will have assured him this will be good for his ongoing development.

Tuesday, July 2, 2013

Latest Transfer Gossip - July 2nd

Ok following on from the first actual cash purchase of the season, following the freebie signings of Lichaj and Jara, there are numerous other rumours floating around out there.




Charlie Austin
The rumour that won’t die would involve us breaking the transfer record. This would do 2 things. Surely this prove once and for all we do have money. Secondly it would also surely break FFP. Furthermore with his scoring record and the fee’s mentioned you’d expect lower Premiership clubs to taking a look at the Burnley striker. For all these reasons I remain a sceptic on this happening. As I said it’d be a message to everyone we mean business, akin to Blackburns signing of Jordan Rhodes last season, BUT I just can’t see it. It’d be a wonderful signing though.


Gary Hooper
This is just fantasy land but some wags yesterday kept saying he was having a medical. His fee would be excessive, he plays Champions League Football with Celtic, and would more suit someone like Norwich or Hull in the Premier League, but people still think it’s a possibility. It isn’t. I’ll eat any of my large array of hats if it happens.


Wes Morgan
In what would be a popular move the club reportedly want Wes. Leicester don’t want to sell. There’s an inpass before you begin, and that’s even if Wes wants to move. It’s not like he’s going to be homesick playing for a team in the next town over, and he’s their club captain. People seem to think that once Red, then they will always walk back home, but the truth is Wes is an integral part of what Leicester are doing, can you see them sacrificing that to a rival? No. It’d be nice, and I can see it, but for what we’d pay there are better options, than paying a premium to prove a point.


Dorus de Vries
This one has popped up today that we want to increase our keeping options with the Dutchman, now released from Wolves after their relegation. It would ease pressure on the youngster Evtimov should he need to step up, but where it would leave al-Rashidi and Darlow, I am unsure. He was deputy to Hennessey at Wolves, and I’d think we seem him as experienced cover for Darlow, whereas al-Rashidi is purely a back up option. It’d provide increased competition too. Darlow is a young keeper, he will go through a bad patch at some stage and will need an old head in that period to help him psychologically and perhaps as a means for a break.

Welcome Jamie Paterson


I’ll open this piece by admitting I next to nothing about this guy, most on Twitter seem to think they are already experts on him, which they have Youtube to thank for. What I have read and what people who seem to know what they are on about have said though excites me. He exactly the sort of player we need.

New Signing Paterson playing for Walsall
A young up and coming hungry player, and a winger to boot. This is exactly what we need, and continue to need and I’ll write more on this later. But he seems to be an exciting talent.

What is most promising is we beat off a host of other clubs supposedly to land his signature. Middlesbrough were also heavily linked amongst a number of Championship clubs. This means not only are an appealing prospect, but also that we are able to compete financially with supposedly big hitters.

Furthermore maybe it signifies a change in focus on where we recruit from, previously looking at Premiership reserves, to looking at players on the rise with a lot to prove. Even if that means there is a raft of fans who complain they never heard of him and aren’t happy because they seem to think we should only sign big named players

The fee is undisclosed. It was believed to be somewhere in the £500k to £1mill bracket depending on who you believe and what’s paid up front and what exists in add ons.

Monday, July 1, 2013

The Window is Open and It's the Same Old Madness

Every year now since the transfer window we seem to getting whipped up into a frenzy of excitement of having to assemble as good a squad together in 2 months as is humanly possible before August 31st. Forgetting of course that usually it only gets exciting in the last few days.


Now people suggest we should try and sort it sooner, to assemble a crack squad early and let them gel in training, but that’s living in some kind of utopian dream world and forgets how much of this works.

Clubs (and for that matter free agents) will be holding out for as good a deal as they can early on. As the drastic realisation that the window is about to shut looms, then those terms for a deal will be reduced. It’s like buying anything. When you rush out straight away, you pay a premium, if you bide your time, bargains can be had, and yeah your first choice may have gone already, but what’s out there is still good enough.

MyOnlyForest blog just did a wonderful piece where they round up how some fans (usually the highly excitable or just young and stupid) demand millions be spent straight away. Fans dementedly tweeting Fawaz he should sign this and that player (ignoring that surely you’d want Billy to be choosing signings rather than Fawaz cherry picking randomly tweeted suggestions) and then getting upset that their killer tip (taken from Football Manager) hasn’t been signed.

The madness that develops when another club signs a player we saw as a target and the anger that we must not be offering enough which means a) we haven money!! Or b) that player is greedy!! Rather than the simplicity we put one value on him, and another club just valued him more or were simply more desperate. This madness is only rivalled by when an ex player who is any good becomes available, and we all go nuts that they weren’t snapped up.

My favourite facet of a transfer rumour is when a player is linked, someone finds said players Twitter account and tweets him asking if it’s true he is signing for the club. Yes of course he will give everything away to some random 15 year old kid that he is indeed spurning signing for one club for Forest instead. The very fact is continues to happens baffles me.

When we do sign someone, people then moan they don’t think he’s good enough. This happens all too often. Never mind the fact that there is a whole history of players not succeeding or doing well at one club moving to another and flourishing. Plus also again as MyOnlyForest pointed out people seem to think only players from the Premier League are worth signing, and a young upcoming kid from down the league isn’t worth even looking at. (Which ignores some of our best recent deals, Chris Cohen, Garath McLeary, Luke Chambers, etc)

So the madness truly begins today. There’s been some names bandied about which just seem ridiculous. If we did sign them, it’s a statement of intent, but at the end of the day splurging a lot of money on players isn’t a guarantee of success. Just ask Leicester. And it took Cardiff years of trying this to finally succeed.

No, building steadily, being patient and targeting the right players for the team is the solution. Not randomly chasing every half decent player who becomes available. That approach achieves nothing other than an overpriced unbalanced squad. Which is what McClaren tried. See how that worked for us?